EDITOR’S NOTE: This week, we are taking a look at some of O’Reilly’s best Christmas-themed columns over the years. Today’s piece is from 2012 and addresses the War on Christmas, and whether or not the word "Christmas" offends those who do not celebrate. Make sure you are subscribed to O’Reilly’s weekly column email newsletter – click here to subscribe.

From December 20, 2012:

Anyone offended by public displays of Christmas needs to see a psychiatrist. Are we clear on this? You are a loon if the sight of baby Jesus arouses anger or sadness in you. Get help.

Which brings us to the Governor of Rhode Island, Lincoln Chafee. He recently told me on national television the reason he will not use the word "Christmas" in describing the state Christmas tree. The idea is that the word might offend non-Christians. The Governor calls the state-purchased symbol a "holiday tree."

My reply to the governor was that by excluding the word "Christmas," he might be offending the 73% of Americans who describe themselves as Christian - not to mention the 2.2 billion Christians worldwide. Chafee chafed when he heard that, but had no answer.

And then the Governor did a very interesting thing: he announced the lighting of the "holiday tree" in Providence a full 30 minutes before the cord was plugged in. Very few Rhode Islanders even knew about the tree lighting because it was done so surreptitiously. Chafee did that because he feared protestors would do what they did last year: sing Christmas carols at the lighting. And we can't have that now, can we?

Jon Stewart and his merry band of elves will tell you that the so-called "War on Christmas" is a figment of the imagination, perhaps a result of indigestion after eating too much holiday pudding. Stewart's posture is similar to what Ebenezer Scrooge put forth when the Ghost of Christmas future told him he was bound for hell. I am channeling Charles Dickens to see if the Ghost can visit Jon Stewart on Christmas Eve. I'll let you know what happens.

There is something to the argument that there are more important things to worry about than whether people like Christmas. But the assaults against the national holiday are annoying, unnecessary, and often disrespectful. I mean, here's how bad it is in this country. A pastor in Arkansas cancelled a play called "Merry Christmas, Charlie Brown" because some nutty atheist objected to public school kids seeing it on church grounds. So Charlie, Snoopy and Linus were thrown under the bus by a Christian cleric. Good Grief!

For all of you separation of church and state fans, here's the deal. Jesus of Nazareth was a man. In fact, he was the most influential person ever born. A third of the world's population has signed on to the Christian edict "love God and love your neighbor as yourself." That sounds like a good thing.

So, when President Grant honored Jesus by signing into law the national holiday of Christmas in 1870, the nation certified that a positive message of generosity and peace was a worthy of a day off. Pretty much everybody was on board.

But not today. In our current state, the Thomas Moore Law Center has to litigate against attacks on Christmas every year. Anti-religion zealots put up billboards in Times Square denouncing Christmas as a "myth." Rabid secularists bridle at any mention of Jesus or his nice mom and dad.

To them I say: Peace on Earth and tough. You don't like the federal holiday, try to rescind it. Start with our pal Lincoln Chafee. See how far you get with that.

And by the way, Merry Christmas to all. Even you loons.